Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 254
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 196-200

Role of glucuronidation pathway in quetiapine metabolism: An in vivo drug–drug interaction study between quetiapine and probenecid


1 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Wuhan Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
2 Department of Pharmacology, Hubei University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China
3 Department of Internal Medicine, Pakistan institute of Medical Sciences Affiliated to Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, Pakistan

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Weiyong Li
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Wuhan Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022
China
Login to access the Email id

DOI: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_441_19

PMID: 32952511

Rights and Permissions

Background: Uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes play a significant role in the metabolism of quetiapine, and coadministration with a UGT inhibitor/inducer drug may change its pharmacokinetic profile. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of probenecid, a UGT enzyme inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetic profile of quetiapine. Materials and Methods: Twelve treatment-naïve, 7-week-old male Sprague–Dawley rats (weighting 161 ± 22 g) were randomly and equally divided into control, quetiapine-alone and quetiapine plus probenecid groups. The quetiapine plus probenecid group received a single oral dose of probenecid (50 mg/kg) followed by 50 mg/kg of quetiapine; the quetiapine-alone group only received 50 mg/kg of quetiapine. Blood samples (0.2 ml) were collected from all rats after 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h of the drug administration in heparinized tubes. The pre-established liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry method was utilized to ascertain the plasma concentration of quetiapine and the control group was used to prepare the controlled standard. Results: Significant pharmacokinetic differences were observed between the quetiapine-alone and quetiapine plus probenecid groups in terms of Cmax (392 ± 209 vs. 1323 ± 343 ug/L, respectively, P = 0.004), AUC0-∞ (P = 0.04) and Tmax (P = 0.004). Further, in the combined drug group, there was a decrease in drug clearance (CL/F) (from 27 ± 11 to 16 ± 3 L/h/kg; P = 0.005) and an increase in the volume of distribution (Vd) (P = 0.01), but there was no significant difference between both groups in terms of half-lives (P = 0.27). No significant within-group variability of pharmacokinetic parameters was observed (P = 0.25). Conclusion: The results of this animal study suggest that glucuronidation by UGT enzyme system may also play an important role in quetiapine metabolism, which, if proven in future human studies, would imply that the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic parameters of quetiapine may require alterations when co-administered with probenecid to avoid development of quetiapine toxicity.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed919    
    Printed31    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded126    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal