Saudi Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2020  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 196--200

Role of glucuronidation pathway in quetiapine metabolism: An in vivo drug–drug interaction study between quetiapine and probenecid


Haseeb Sattar1, Sarmad Sheraz Jadoon2, Ni Yang1, Shihong Li1, Mingzhen Xu1, Yong Han1, Adil Ramzan3, Weiyong Li1 
1 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Wuhan Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
2 Department of Pharmacology, Hubei University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China
3 Department of Internal Medicine, Pakistan institute of Medical Sciences Affiliated to Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, Pakistan

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Weiyong Li
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Wuhan Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022
China

Background: Uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes play a significant role in the metabolism of quetiapine, and coadministration with a UGT inhibitor/inducer drug may change its pharmacokinetic profile. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of probenecid, a UGT enzyme inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetic profile of quetiapine. Materials and Methods: Twelve treatment-naïve, 7-week-old male Sprague–Dawley rats (weighting 161 ± 22 g) were randomly and equally divided into control, quetiapine-alone and quetiapine plus probenecid groups. The quetiapine plus probenecid group received a single oral dose of probenecid (50 mg/kg) followed by 50 mg/kg of quetiapine; the quetiapine-alone group only received 50 mg/kg of quetiapine. Blood samples (0.2 ml) were collected from all rats after 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h of the drug administration in heparinized tubes. The pre-established liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry method was utilized to ascertain the plasma concentration of quetiapine and the control group was used to prepare the controlled standard. Results: Significant pharmacokinetic differences were observed between the quetiapine-alone and quetiapine plus probenecid groups in terms of Cmax (392 ± 209 vs. 1323 ± 343 ug/L, respectively, P = 0.004), AUC0-∞ (P = 0.04) and Tmax (P = 0.004). Further, in the combined drug group, there was a decrease in drug clearance (CL/F) (from 27 ± 11 to 16 ± 3 L/h/kg; P = 0.005) and an increase in the volume of distribution (Vd) (P = 0.01), but there was no significant difference between both groups in terms of half-lives (P = 0.27). No significant within-group variability of pharmacokinetic parameters was observed (P = 0.25). Conclusion: The results of this animal study suggest that glucuronidation by UGT enzyme system may also play an important role in quetiapine metabolism, which, if proven in future human studies, would imply that the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic parameters of quetiapine may require alterations when co-administered with probenecid to avoid development of quetiapine toxicity.


How to cite this article:
Sattar H, Jadoon SS, Yang N, Li S, Xu M, Han Y, Ramzan A, Li W. Role of glucuronidation pathway in quetiapine metabolism: An in vivo drug–drug interaction study between quetiapine and probenecid.Saudi J Med Med Sci 2020;8:196-200


How to cite this URL:
Sattar H, Jadoon SS, Yang N, Li S, Xu M, Han Y, Ramzan A, Li W. Role of glucuronidation pathway in quetiapine metabolism: An in vivo drug–drug interaction study between quetiapine and probenecid. Saudi J Med Med Sci [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 1 ];8:196-200
Available from: http://www.sjmms.net/article.asp?issn=1658-631X;year=2020;volume=8;issue=3;spage=196;epage=200;aulast=Sattar;type=0