Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 469
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 40-42

Adhesive small bowel obstruction due to pelvic inflammatory disease: A case report


Department of Surgery, King Fahd Hospital of the University, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

Date of Web Publication14-Dec-2017

Correspondence Address:
Abdulmohsen A Al-Mulhim
Department of Surgery, King Fahd Hospital of the University, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

DOI: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_10_17

PMID: 30787816

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

We report a rare case of a 32-year-old woman with adhesive small bowel obstruction due to pelvic inflammatory disease. She had no history of abdominal surgery, gynecological complaints or constitutional symptoms of chronic illness. The diagnosis was based on the laparoscopic findings of small bowel adhesions, free peritoneal fluid, “violin string” adhesions of Fitz-Hugh–Curtis syndrome and left hydrosalpinx. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis was performed successfully, and the patient had an uneventful postoperative course. The authors conclude that pelvic inflammatory disease should be included as a cause of adhesive small bowel obstruction in sexually active young women with no history of abdominal surgery or constitutional symptoms of chronic disease. When performed by experienced surgeons, laparoscopy in such patients is feasible and safe.

Keywords: Fitz-Hugh–Curtis syndrome, laparoscopy, pelvic inflammatory disease, small bowel obstruction


How to cite this article:
Al-Ghassab RA, Tanveer S, Al-Lababidi NH, Zakaria HM, Al-Mulhim AA. Adhesive small bowel obstruction due to pelvic inflammatory disease: A case report. Saudi J Med Med Sci 2018;6:40-2

How to cite this URL:
Al-Ghassab RA, Tanveer S, Al-Lababidi NH, Zakaria HM, Al-Mulhim AA. Adhesive small bowel obstruction due to pelvic inflammatory disease: A case report. Saudi J Med Med Sci [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 May 19];6:40-2. Available from: http://www.sjmms.net/text.asp?2018/6/1/40/220786


  Introduction Top


Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common surgical emergency. Postoperative adhesions are the most common cause of SBO. However, intra-abdominal adhesions may result from other inflammatory processes such as inflammatory bowel disease, colonic diverticulitis and tuberculous peritonitis.[1],[2],[3]

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) secondary to gonococcal or chlamydial infection remains a common pathology in sexually active women. Common complications of PID include chronic pelvic pain, infertility and ectopic pregnancy.[4]

Conventionally, laparotomy is the standard approach for SBO. Currently, more surgeons are performing laparoscopy in patients with SBO.[1] Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopy is associated with less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and convalescence period as well as better cosmetic results.[5] However, laparoscopy may result in vascular or visceral injuries, particularly during insertion of the Veress needle and mobilization of the distended bowel. Hence, all precautions must be taken to prevent serious complications, and the procedure must be done by surgeons with good experience in advanced laparoscopy.

Here, the authors report a rare case of a young woman with adhesive SBO, most likely due to PID, who underwent laparoscopic management.


  Case Report Top


A 32-year-old woman presented with generalized colicky abdominal pain, bilious vomiting and constipation of 1-day duration. She had no history of abdominal surgery or constitutional symptoms of chronic illness such as tuberculosis, inflammatory bowel disease or malignancy. She had been married for more than 10 years and has one child. Her vital signs were normal. Complete blood count, liver and renal function tests, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels were normal. Abdominal examination revealed diffuse distention with hyperactive bowel sounds; there were no hernias or signs of peritonitis. The clinical impression and plain abdominal X-ray findings were consistent with subacute SBO. Initially, the patient improved on conservative management of nil by mouth, intravenous (IV) fluids and nasogastric tube (NGT) decompression. Abdominal computerized tomography scan with water-soluble contrast through NGT revealed dilated loops of small bowel, left hydrosalpinx and contrast reaching the colon. The patient underwent laparoscopic intervention because of persistence of her symptoms and to establish the underlying cause. Laparoscopic findings were multiple small bowel adhesions (mainly ileal), “violin string” adhesions between the liver and anterior abdominal wall, free peritoneal fluid and left hydrosalpinx [Figure 1]. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis was performed using endoshears and diathermy [Figure 1]. Swab samples were initially taken from the peritoneal fluid and later from the uterine cervix to test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis. Swabs and serology for both organisms were negative. Gynecological consultation was sought, and no antibiotics were recommended because the patient did not have active PID. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged 5 days after surgery. Two months later, she remained symptom-free when seen at the outpatient clinic.
Figure 1: Laparoscopic view of (a) “violin-string” adhesions, (b) left hydrosalpinx and free peritoneal fluid and (c) lysis of adhesions

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The authors initially managed our patient conservatively according to the Bologna Guidelines, namely, nil by mouth, IV fluids and NGT decompression.[6] However, surgical intervention was necessary because of the persistent abdominal pain and distention and to establish the underlying cause. Based on our experience,[5] the authors opted for a laparoscopic approach, which was done without complications. Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopy results in less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and rapid recovery.[5] It also permits visualization of the entire abdomen and pelvis. According to some authors, laparoscopy is associated with a lower incidence of adhesions compared with laparotomy.[7] Similar to patients in earlier reported cases, our patient had no history of documented PID or gynecological complaints.[8],[9] However, the authors believe that her adhesive SBO was due to PID based on the following reasons. First, she was a sexually active young woman. Second, she had secondary infertility because of which she was able to have only one child in her 10 years of marriage. Finally, laparoscopic findings of “violin string” adhesions, left hydrosalpinx and straw-colored peritoneal fluid [Figure 1].

Fitz-Hugh–Curtis syndrome refers to perihepatitis secondary to PID. It is rare, having being found to occur in only 4–14% of patients with PID.[10] Its pathognomonic finding is “violin string” adhesions between the liver capsule, anterior abdominal wall and surrounding parietes. In patients with PID, adhesive SBO and Fitz-Hugh–Curtis syndrome most likely result from transperitoneal, lymphatic or hematogenous dissemination to the bowel serosa and liver capsule, respectively.[10] About two-thirds of patients with Fitz-Hugh–Curtis syndrome develop clinical manifestations such as acute/chronic right abdominal pain mimicking acute cholecystitis/biliary colic.[9],[10] Rarely, patients present with intestinal obstruction due to entrapment of the intestine between the “violin string” adhesions (Chilaiditi syndrome).[8] Our patient was among one-third of patients who have asymptomatic Fitz-Hugh–Curtis syndrome. Her “violin string” adhesions were harmless and only incidentally discovered during laparoscopy. We concur with authors who have found that asymptomatic “violin string” adhesions require no adhesiolysis.[11] We believe that the wide practice of laparoscopy, particularly laparoscopic cholecystectomy, will increase surgeons' awareness of Fitz-Hugh–Curtis syndrome.


  Conclusion Top


In sexually active women with virgin abdomen and no constitutional symptoms of chronic disease or malignancy, PID must be considered as a cause of adhesive SBO. When performed by experienced surgeons, laparoscopy in such cases is both diagnostic and therapeutic and results in good outcome.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that her name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal her identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Yao S, Tanaka E, Ikeda A, Murakami T, Okumoto T, Harada T. Outcomes of laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction: A 7-year experience of 110 consecutive cases with various etiologies. Surg Today 2017;47:432-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Chen XZ, Wei T, Jiang K, Yang K, Zhang B, Chen ZX, et al. Etiological factors and mortality of acute intestinal obstruction: A review of 705 cases. Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao 2008;6:1010-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Markogiannakis H, Messaris E, Dardamanis D, Pararas N, Tzertzemelis D, Giannopoulos P, et al. Acute mechanical bowel obstruction: Clinical presentation, etiology, management and outcome. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:432-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Das BB, Ronda J, Trent M. Pelvic inflammatory disease: Improving awareness, prevention, and treatment. Infect Drug Resist 2016;9:191-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Al-Mulhim AA. Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Experience from a Saudi teaching hospital. Surg Endosc 2000;14:157-60.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Di Saverio S, Coccolini F, Galati M, Smerieri N, Biffl WL, Ansaloni L, et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2013 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World J Emerg Surg 2013;8:42.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Barmparas G, Branco BC, Schnüriger B, Lam L, Inaba K, Demetriades D. The incidence and risk factors of post-laparotomy adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:1619-28.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Oh SN, Rha SE, Byun JY, Kim JY, Song KY, Park CH. Chilaiditi syndrome caused by Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome: Multidetector CT findings. Abdom Imaging 2006;31:45-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Burton E, McKeating J, Stahlfeld K. Laparoscopic management of a small bowel obstruction of unknown cause. JSLS 2008;12:299-302.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Peter NG, Clark LR, Jaeger JR. Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome: A diagnosis to consider in women with right upper quadrant pain. Cleve Clin J Med 2004;71:233-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Abul-Khoudoud OR, Khabbaz AY, Butcher CH, Farha MJ. Mechanical partial small bowel obstruction in a patient with Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2001;11:111-4.  Back to cited text no. 11
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Case Report
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1469    
    Printed27    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded196    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]