Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 636
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 50-53

Clinical outcomes of hook-plate fixation in the treatment of unstable distal clavicular fractures and acromioclavicular joint dislocations


1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bahrain Defence Force Hospital, Bahrain, Bahrain
3 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, King Hamad University Hospital, Bahrain, Bahrain
4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain, Bahrain

Date of Web Publication20-Jan-2015

Correspondence Address:
Naif M Alhamam
King Faisal University, P.O. Box 1625, Al-Ahsa 31982
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

DOI: 10.4103/1658-631X.149679

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Presented here is a case series assessing the outcomes following hook-plate fixation in patients with acute unstable (Neer type 2) fractures of the distal clavicle and acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations .
Materials and Methods: A total of 38 patients fit the criteria of our retrospective study. The ages of the patients ranged from 17 to 50 years (mean of 28 years). Twenty-one patients had AC joint dislocations, whereas 17 had unstable distal clavicular fractures. The average follow-up period was 18 months (period from 13 to 23 months). Subjective shoulder scores (Constant Shoulder Score, Oxford Shoulder Score) were assessed along with radiological images.
Results: No early complications, iatrogenic fractures, acromial osteolysis or other complications were found. The average constant score was 92.4 (range of 85-100); the difference between normal and abnormal sides was found to be <11, whereas the mean Oxford Score was 45 (ranging from 40 to 48).
Conclusion: Hook-plate fixation is an invaluable method of stabilizing acute unstable distal clavicular fractures and AC joint dislocations, resulting in high union rates and restoration of shoulder function.

  Abstract in Arabic 

ملخص البحث:
هذه دراسة استرجاعية لسلسلة من الحالات لتقييم عملية تثبيت لوحة هوك عند المرضى المصابين بكسور عظمة الترقوة الحاد غير المستقر وكذلك خلع المفصل الأخرمي. وشملت الدراسة 83 مريضًا، 12 منهم يعانون من خلع المفصل الأخرمي و 71 مريضًا من كسور عظمة الترقوة الحاد غير المستقر. تمت متابعة هذه الحالات لمدة 81 شهرًا بصور الأشعة. ووضحت النتائج عدم حدوث مضاعفات أو كسور بسب المعالجة أو تحلل العظام الطرفية. خلصت الدراسة إلى أن عملية تثبيت لوحة هوك تمثل طريقة ممتازة لتثبيت كسور عظمة الترقوة الحادة وخلع المفصل الأخرمي وتؤدي إلى معدلات التحام عالية واسترداد وظيفة الكتف.




Keywords: Acromioclavicular, arbeitsgemeinschaft fόr osteosynthesefragen, clavicle, hook-plate


How to cite this article:
Alhamam NM, Bella IH, Uddin FZ, Al-Afaleq MA, Al-Afaleq SA, Al-Khalifa FK. Clinical outcomes of hook-plate fixation in the treatment of unstable distal clavicular fractures and acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Saudi J Med Med Sci 2015;3:50-3

How to cite this URL:
Alhamam NM, Bella IH, Uddin FZ, Al-Afaleq MA, Al-Afaleq SA, Al-Khalifa FK. Clinical outcomes of hook-plate fixation in the treatment of unstable distal clavicular fractures and acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Saudi J Med Med Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Jun 20];3:50-3. Available from: http://www.sjmms.net/text.asp?2015/3/1/50/149679


  Introduction Top


Unstable fractures of the distal clavicle and acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are a clinical problem. The original classification by Neer in the 1960s described two types of distal clavicular fractures: Type I in which the coracoclavicular ligaments remain intact, and type II in which the coracoclavicular ligaments are torn from the medial fragment (only the trapezoid ligament remains attached to the lateral fragment). [1] This classification was later revised to include type III fractures which involved extension into the AC joint; type IV fractures which are seen in children and involve a disruption of the periosteal sleeve and type V, which involve an avulsion of the ligaments with a small inferior cortical fragment. [2]

Acromioclavicular joint injuries are classified most commonly using the 6-grade system described by Rockwood et al.[3] (a modification to the earlier 3-type classification system described by Allman [4] and Tossy et al.[5] ). It takes into account not only the AC joint itself, but also the coracoclavicular ligament, the deltoid and trapezius muscles and the direction of the dislocation of the clavicle with respect to the acromion. Types IV, V, and VI are unstable and therefore, mandate early surgical reduction and fixation. Conservative management of these injuries can lead to deleterious consequences such as joint arthritis. The debate on the most appropriate method of management of these injuries ranges with the recommendation of open reduction and internal fixation as a first choice of treatment by some, while others are strong in their advocacy of conservative treatment. Here, we report our experience of using the hook-plate [Figure 1] in the treatment of unstable distal clavicular fractures.

The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of the AO clavicular hook-plate in the management of unstable distal clavicular fractures and AC joint dislocations.
Figure 1: Right acromiclavicular fracture dislocation fixed with hook plate.

Click here to view



  Materials and methods Top


All clavicular injuries utilizing the AO hook-plate that were used in operations in the Bahrain Defense Force Hospital from 2005 to 2011 were identified. Thirty-eight patients (37 males and one female) whose ages ranged from 17 to 50 years (mean of 28 years) were included in the study. Twenty-one suffered AC joint dislocations, whereas 17 had unstable distal clavicular fractures. All injuries were acute and operated on between 2005 and 2011. Healing and complications of the procedure were assessed retrospectively from case records and radiographs. The Constant Shoulder Score and the Oxford Score [Table 1] and [Table 2] (subjective questionnaires) were then assessed during a scheduled clinical follow-up.
Table 1: Constant shoulder score

Click here to view
Table 2: Oxford score

Click here to view



  Results Top


All injuries healed by first intention without complications such as recurrent AC subluxations/ dislocations, infection or frozen shoulder. Loosening of the implant was identified and all patients were put on follow-up for an average of 18 months. X-ray analysis demonstrated that the bony union was achieved in all patients after 3-6 months with a mean healing duration of 3.9 months. The mean Oxford Score was 45 (range of 40-48) and the mean Constant Shoulder Score was 92.4 (range of 85-100). The difference of the Constant Shoulder score between the normal and abnormal sides was <11. No restrictions of the range of motion were found in any of the subjects.


  Discussion Top


There are several well-described methods for the management of displaced distal clavicle fractures and AC dislocations. K-wiring tension band wiring, coraco-clavicular screw, direct plate fixation and conservative management were few. The AO hook-plate fixation has resulted in an excellent union rate, no limitations of shoulder function and overall patient satisfaction. [6],[7],[8]

Fractures of the distal end of the clavicle represent over 20% of clavicular fractures. [9],[10] They are associated with a high rate of non-union and delayed union after conservative management. [11] Conservative management has been extensively studied. Nordqvist et al.[12] reported ten non-unions in 23 patients with type 2 fractures after conservative treatment. Eight of these were asymptomatic; no patient had severe residual shoulder dysfunction. The authors recommended that short-term sling immobilization can be used to treat Neer type 2 fractures of the distal clavicle. They did not objectively assess shoulder function. Neer et al.[13] found a non-union rate of 50% using conservative methods. On the other hand, a study of 43 patients with type 2 fractures conservatively managed, found a much higher incidence of local complications, residual shoulder dysfunction and non-unions. [14] They recommended open reduction and internal fixation as the treatment of choice.

The complication rates following K-wire fixation are controversial with reported high rates of wire migration. [15],[16] Migration after Knowles pin fixation is less common, but the pin violates the AC joint. This can lead to the development of osteoarthritis. [17] Hackenberger et al. in 2004 [18] studied 28 shoulders after hook-plate fixation using magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography. They found no rotator cuff lesions or signs of impingement. Although several authors have reported a high rate of non-union, pain and shoulder dysfunction with conservative treatment, the need for operative treatment of Neer type 2 fractures is still debatable. The retrospective comparative study by Edwards et al.[14] suggested that a non-surgical treatment leads to non-union in one-third of cases and delayed union in half of all cases. Local complications such as shoulder dysfunction were more common after conservative management than after an operation. In contrast, Robinson et al.[19] recommended non-operative treatment of patients older than 35 years. A retrospective study of 30 patients also came to the same conclusion and suggested that surgical treatment was unnecessary. [20]

Our study reinforces the clinical application of the AO hook-plate in the treatment of unstable distal clavicular fracture and AC joint dislocations. We demonstrated ideal function and union which was evident both clinically and radiologically. In our technique of fixation, an AO plate was applied on the superior part of the clavicle and the hook passed below the acromion, posterior to the AC joint thereby not disrupting the joint and allowing the ligaments to heal.

No early complications were found such as infection, soft tissue problems, non-union, delayed union, calcification of the coracoclavicular ligaments or AC joint discrepancies (diastasis of the AC joint and re-dislocation of the AC joint).


  Conclusion Top


Arbeitsgemeinschaft für osteosynthesefragen (AO) hook-plate fixation of unstable lateral clavicle fractures and AC joint dislocations resulted in an accelerated rate of union. The principal advantages of this method are anatomical reduction and early rehabilitation leading to satisfactory healing and excellent shoulder girdle function.

Based on our results, this is a reliable method which restores shoulder function and improves patient outcomes.

 
  References Top

1.
Neer CS 2 nd . Fractures of the distal third of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1968;58:43-50.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Anderson K. Evaluation and treatment of distal clavicle fractures. Clin Sports Med 2003;22:319-26, vii.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Rockwood CA, Williams GR, Youg DC. Disorders of the acromioclavicular joint. In: Rockwood CA, Masten FA 2 nd , editors. The Shoulder. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1998. p. 483-553.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Allman FL Jr. Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1967;49:774-84.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Tossy JD, Mead NC, Sigmond HM. Acromioclavicular separations: Useful and practical classification for treatment. Clin Orthop 1963;28:111-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Koukakis A, Manouras A, Apostolou CD, Lagoudianakis E, Papadima A, Triantafillou C, et al. Results using the AO hook plate for dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint. Expert Rev Med Devices 2008;5:567-72.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Muramatsu K, Shigetomi M, Matsunaga T, Murata Y, Taguchi T. Use of the AO hook-plate for treatment of unstable fractures of the distal clavicle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007;127:191-4.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Faraj AA, Ketzer B. The use of a hook-plate in the management of acromioclavicular injuries. Report of ten cases. Acta Orthop Belg 2001;67:448-51.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:476-84.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Nordqvist A, Petersson C. The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;127-32.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Banerjee R, Waterman B, Padalecki J, Robertson W. Management of distal clavicle fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011;19:392-401.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Nordqvist A, Petersson CJ, Redlund-Johnell I. Mid-clavicle fractures in adults: End result study after conservative treatment. J Orthop Trauma 1998;12:572-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Neer CS 2 nd . Fracture dislocation of the shoulder. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Green DP, editors. Fractures in Adults. 2 nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1984.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Edwards DJ, Kavanagh TG, Flannery MC. Fractures of the distal clavicle: A case for fixation. Injury 1992;23:44-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kona J, Bosse MJ, Staeheli JW, Rosseau RL. Type II distal clavicle fractures: A retrospective review of surgical treatment. J Orthop Trauma 1990;4:115-20.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Flinkkilä T, Ristiniemi J, Hyvönen P, Hämäläinen M. Surgical treatment of unstable fractures of the distal clavicle: A comparative study of Kirschner wire and clavicular hook plate fixation. Acta Orthop Scand 2002;73:50-3.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Fann CY, Chiu FY, Chuang TY, Chen CM, Chen TH. Transacromial knowles pin in the treatment of Neer type 2 distal clavicle fractures. A prospective evaluation of 32 cases. J Trauma 2004;56:1102-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Hackenberger J, Schmidt J, Altmann T. The effects of hook plates on the subacromial space: A clinical and MRT study. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2004;142:603-10.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Wakefield AE. Estimating the risk of non-union following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1359-65.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Rokito AS, Zuckerman JD, Shaari JM, Eisenberg DP, Cuomo F, Gallagher MA. A comparison of nonoperative and operative treatment of type II distal clavicle fractures. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2002;61:32-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and me...
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1720    
    Printed27    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded153    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]